While acupuncture is readily accepted as a viable option for low back pain in mainstream modern medicine, there has been little research to prove that it works.  Now there are studies that support the clinical evidence.

In a German study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, 1,162 adults with chronic, lower back pain were divided into groups treated with the standard pharmaceutical and exercise therapy commonly used in Western medicine and acupuncture. The researchers reported that acupuncture provided relief and lasting benefit to nearly twice as many lower back pain patients as drugs and exercise. Forty-eight percent of the acupuncture patients reported at least a one-third decrease in pain along with improvement in their ability to function, versus 27 percent of the patients treated with conventional methods reporting such benefits.

In the July 2009 issue of Acupuncture Today, they reported findings from a new study.  Published in the May 2009 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine this new study adds to the growing body of evidence showing the efficacy of acupuncture for back pain.

In this study, 638 patients suffering from back pain were divided into four groups:

Individualized acupuncture: This treatment was prescribed by the diagnostician at the beginning of each visit. There were no constraints on number of needles, depth of insertion or needle manipulation. Needles were retained for 18 minutes. Seventy-four distinct points were used.

Standardized acupuncture: This protocol used a standardized acupuncture prescription considered effective for chronic low back pain, including DU3, UB23 on either side, low back Ashi point, UB 40 on either side and KD 3 on either side. All points were needled for 20 minutes, with needle stimulation at 10 minutes and again just prior to removal.

Simulated acupuncture*: This technique used a toothpick in a needle guide tube. All acupuncture points were stimulated with toothpicks at 10 minutes and again at 20 minutes, just before they were “removed.” The acupuncturists simulated insertion and removal of needles at the eight acupuncture points used in the standardized treatment.

Usual care: Participants in this group only received the care, if any, they and their physicians chose. This was mainly medications, and primary care, and physical therapy visits. All participants received a self-care book with information on managing flare-ups, exercises and lifestyle modifications.

At 8 weeks all patients showed improvement, however, the “usual care” group improved only 2.1 points improvement, scored on a disability questionnaire, as opposed to the individualized, standardized and simulated acupuncture groups who improved by 4.4, 4.5 and 4.4 points respectively.

The greater improvement for the acupuncture groups continued to 52 weeks, the end of the study.

Researchers concluded that compared to usual care, acupuncture had beneficial and persisting effects on chronic back pain.  They stated the acupuncture treatments resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in function, and really, isn’t that the bottom line when you’re getting treatment for pain?

*Simulated acupuncture.  Ironically, this simulated acupuncture is known by practitioners by another name – acupressure.  Additionally, many of the earliest acupuncture practitioners used needles-like implements to stimulate a point but did not insert the implement into the body, or if they did it was a very shallow pricking insertion.  Full insertion into the body came later, so it’s no surprise to any acupuncturist that “simulated” acupuncture would work as well as acupuncture with needle insertion.